Periodicals Draft! Results!
4:41 PM
Like the aspiring Print Media Barons we all are, the group (OK, me, your friendly administrateur) decided to draft periodicals. The rules: online media counts (no blogs), and your publication must be, um, published more than 5 times each year. That ruled out Dan's favorite biennial, Anarchy Every-So-Oftenly, as well as the oft-forgotten gem, Engineering! Go For It!
Commentary to follow by the end of the week. Have at them:
(ps. Sign #1 that you are too anal: making individual links for every periodical drafted. Enjoy.)
Round 1:
Chris - New York Times
Adam - Washington Post
Dan - The Economist
Sarah - New Yorker
Sydney - Slate
Round 2:
Sydney - Wall Street Journal
Sarah - Atlantic Monthly
Dan - Salon.com
Adam - New York Review of Books
Chris - Time
Round 3:
Chris - Rolling Stone
Adam - The Onion
Dan - Forbes
Sarah - Nature
Sydney - International Herald Tribune
Round 4:
Sydney - Newsweek
Sarah - Scientific American
Dan - The Observer (London)
Adam - National Geographic
Chris - Financial Times
Round 5:
Chris - Sports Illustrated
Adam - Foreign Affairs
Dan - Los Angeles Times
Sarah - Vanity Fair
Sydney - W Magazine
Round 6:
Sydney - Wired
Sarah - Reason
Dan - Playboy
Adam - New Republic
Chris - Christian Science Monitor
Round 7:
Chris - InStyle
Adam - Harper's
Dan - ESPN, the Magazine
Sarah - McSweeney's Quarterly Concern
Sydney - Gourmet
Round 8:
Sydney - CMJ New Music Monthly
Sarah - Foreign Policy
Dan - Ploughshares
Adam - The Times of London
Chris - Roll Call
Commentary to follow by the end of the week. Have at them:
(ps. Sign #1 that you are too anal: making individual links for every periodical drafted. Enjoy.)
Round 1:
Chris - New York Times
Adam - Washington Post
Dan - The Economist
Sarah - New Yorker
Sydney - Slate
Round 2:
Sydney - Wall Street Journal
Sarah - Atlantic Monthly
Dan - Salon.com
Adam - New York Review of Books
Chris - Time
Round 3:
Chris - Rolling Stone
Adam - The Onion
Dan - Forbes
Sarah - Nature
Sydney - International Herald Tribune
Round 4:
Sydney - Newsweek
Sarah - Scientific American
Dan - The Observer (London)
Adam - National Geographic
Chris - Financial Times
Round 5:
Chris - Sports Illustrated
Adam - Foreign Affairs
Dan - Los Angeles Times
Sarah - Vanity Fair
Sydney - W Magazine
Round 6:
Sydney - Wired
Sarah - Reason
Dan - Playboy
Adam - New Republic
Chris - Christian Science Monitor
Round 7:
Chris - InStyle
Adam - Harper's
Dan - ESPN, the Magazine
Sarah - McSweeney's Quarterly Concern
Sydney - Gourmet
Round 8:
Sydney - CMJ New Music Monthly
Sarah - Foreign Policy
Dan - Ploughshares
Adam - The Times of London
Chris - Roll Call
9 Comments:
Your tyrannical rules prevented me from drafting the 1999-2000 Gonzaga Aquilian too.
Ploughshares -- what a brilliant pick, this draft was pretty interesting guys, better hope your commentary is fit to print in the New Yorker, well the New Yorker circa 1978.
I appreciate the agreement that by Rule Glib & Superficial could not be selected. This avoided what could have been a very ugly situation.
"Dan" doesn't read much, does he?
FYI:
An eyeball estimate of all printed publications (excluding Slate, Salon, etc.) in this draft yields a total price of $168 for one newsstand copy of each periodical.
Legitimate attempts at a more exacting bill will be printed.
Man, you really need a hobby
because it's inferior.
also, adam really has too much time on his hands.
OK, listen up, assholes. I *SAID* at the time that it was an eyeball estimate. It took me about 3 minutes to come up with. Don't imagine me poring over a newsstand, or clicking on subscriptions on each publication's website, or anything. Because I did not do that. Now Baroness, go atone for your insensitive comments.
It is a mystery to me that this group omitted Highlights Magazine.
Also, did anyone else notice that although his image inspires dreams of the awesome power of the publishing world, not one of Mr. Hearst's publications made it (or could even be seriously considered) in the draft? Poor Oprah!
Post a Comment
<< Home